Products that claim to be non-custodial but feature custodial accounts without very clearly marking those as custodial are also considered “custodial” as a whole to avoid misguiding users that follow our assessment. They might be a trustworthy Bitcoin bank and they might be a better fit for certain users than being your own bank but our investigation still stops there as we are only interested in wallets.
For our evaluation of it being a wallet, these details are irrelevant. Some services might claim their setup is super secure, that they don’t actually have access to the funds, or that the access is shared between multiple parties.
The custodial service can at any point steal all the funds of all the users at their discretion. This app is not verifiable.Īs the provider of this product holds the keys, verifiability of the product is not relevant to the security of the funds!Īs part of our Methodology, we ask: Is the product self-custodial? If not, we tag it Custodial!Ī custodial service is a service where the funds are held by a third party like the provider. Reviews for the app also mention ID card verification.ĪPI is available but unfortunately there’s no source code.
#COINCHECK WALLET CODE#
Coincheck wallet will enable everyone to exchange money without using cash or credit card.Ĭoincheck wallet supports 2-step authentication and PIN code lock. The Analysis ¶Īnyone can easily send Bitcoins just by scanning QR code! You can also convert address for receiving Bitcoins to QR code as well. This analysis yourself and create a merge request for your changes. If you find something we should include, you can Make sure you understand why they were made and if you areĬomfortable with the provider's reaction.
For all the bigger wallets you willįind accusations. Think the wallet is generally trustworthy. Please help us spread the word discussing the risks of centralized custodians with Coincheck Bitcoin Walletįor "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's Help spread awareness for build reproducibility
0 kommentar(er)
